Jost Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:48:00AM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote: > >> 2) It is *not* the frigging MX record. That has nothing to do with it. Any >> mailer that breaks when there is only an A record is a broken mailer. > >And who says so? I'm sure every mailer SHOULD fall back to the A record, >but the RFCs don't demand it. They don't demand it, but they do suggest it, and in practice, that's the way things work. I've got dozens of systems with no MX entries that receive mail from all over the Internet without any problems. -Dave
- Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? hbchen163
- RE: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? Jack O'Toole
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... hbchen163
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail messages? hbchen163
- RE: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail mes... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmai... Jost Krieger
- Re: Why qmail can not receive ho... Dave Sill
- Re: Why qmail can not receive ho... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Jack O'Toole
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Dave Sill
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Adam McKenna
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Chris Garrigues
- RE: Why qmail can not receiv... Brett Randall
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... hbchen163
- Re: Why qmail can not receiv... Petr Novotny
- Re: Why qmail can not receive hotmail message... Jason Brooke