On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:24:07AM +0000, Greg Cope wrote: >Also sending one message will reduce the I/O required compared to n >messages. If you can get away with having a single message with tons of BCCs... >What about using tcpserver to limit the inbound connections - or even >move this to another box (if you can split the list like that). The incoming mail isn't bounces or the like, it's the actual message to deliver out... Moving bounces off to another machine or another queue can help, but it's still really easy to swamp the system by injecting messages. Sean -- Decide who gets root on your country. VOTE! November 7, 2000 Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pip... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Greg Cope
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance configs [was... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs ... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance configs ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pip... Greg Cope
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to qmai... Jeff Mayzurk
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pip... Peter van Dijk
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Matt Brown
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Peter van Dijk
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to qmai... Jeff Mayzurk