On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:38:24AM +0000, Greg Cope wrote: >Hence to improve performance inject should be split up i.e inject 2000, >wait, inject another 2000. In the wait times concurrency remote would >be reached. I always felt that it wasn't that useful to have the concurrency hit, until the injection was completed. It takes time to ramp up and down from full concurrencyremote. During this time you're not reaching full performance for either sending or injection. Unless you're out of space on the queue device. >Any ideas on what a good number to try would be for inject / wait cycle >? You don't want your todo to get too big, I'd pause injection when the todo gets to be a few hundred messages, especially if you aren't using the big-todo patches. Sean -- Hack the government. VOTE! November 7, 2000 Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to qmai... Jeff Mayzurk
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to... Greg Cope
- Mail server problems. Rob Hines Jr.
- Re: Mail server problems. Brett Randall
- RE: Mail server problems. Kevin Bucknum
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pip... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Greg Cope
- Re: high performance configs [was... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance configs ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance conf... Markus Stumpf
- Re: high performance conf... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Greg Cope
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blo... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to... Jeff Mayzurk
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pip... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked... Peter van Dijk