"David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dan is probably right that no special permissions are needed to make >normal uses of his code (which is what he says on his web pages), but >if the corporate lawyer isn't in agreement with him, he's going to say >"no". That's a corporate lawyer's job, after all. Anyone's lawyers disagree with Dan? If not, I don't see why Dan should concern himself with convincing hypothetical lawyers...real lawyers are enough of a challenge. -Dave
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Chris K. Young
- Re: secrets and lies markd
- Re: secrets and lies Ryan Russell
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Chris K. Young
- DFSG and DJB (was Re: secrets and lies) Greg Hudson
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Dave Sill
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Adam McKenna
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc