Re: secrets and lies

[Paul Jarc]

Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want an unambiguous license included with the software that
> explicitly defines what I am allowed to do with it.  If you don't
> need that then fine, but please don't argue that it's not needed,
> because there are clearly a number of people on this list that
> desire it.

Please don't confuse need with desire.  You may not like dist.html or
softwarelaw.html or rights.html, but I don't see ambiguity in them,
and I don't see how including them in the software distributions would
make them any more legally significant.


paul