Re: secrets and lies

[Paul Jarc]

"Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Jarc wrote:
> > ... I don't see ambiguity in them [dist.html or softwarelaw.html or
> > rights.html] ...
> 
> Are you not as analytical as those who criticise the situation?

Not that I'm aware of.  As I said, I think it's just that when
information is not given, it's called "ambiguity" by some, and not by
others (such as me).


paul