Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Two things come to mind the first is the Artistic under which Perl is > released The Artistic License was explicitly designed to be part of a dual-licensing arrangement. It's not strong enough to stand on its own; the language hasn't been hammered out nearly well enough. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Michael T. Babcock
- Re: secrets and lies Vinko Vrsalovic
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- RE: secrets and lies Russ Allbery
- RE: secrets and lies zone
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Raul Miller
- RE: secrets and lies Al
- Re: secrets and lies Felix von Leitner
- Re: secrets and lies Greg Hudson