On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:40:47PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security > challenge". > http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html > If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a > bug... You quote it, but have you also read the document? Especially the "Rules" section, part 1. (and also 8.1) \Maex -- SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Markus Stumpf
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Markus Stumpf
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Ha... Markus Stumpf
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... qmail
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Ha... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... paul
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Mark Delany
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Patrick Bihan-Faou