Re: Why so few qmail-remote processes

[Paul Jarc]

Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 09:30:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > If you really want to retry failed deliveries more often, send
> > qmail-send SIGHUP every once in a while.
> 
> I'm no wizard or anything, but isn't ALRM the signal you want for that?
> Doesn't HUP just reread locals and rcpthosts?

Right, sorry.  /me rereads man qmail-send.


paul