Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karl Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 25 Feb 2001:
> > If I'm reading the RFCs correctly, the right order is "Reply-to:", then
> > "From:", then "Sender:".
>
> How about using the envelope sender (ie. return-path)?
>
> I missed the original message, so maybe this isn't really applicable,
> but in general you should take mailing lists into account. On most
> mailing lists, including this one, the right return address is not
> found in any of those headers.
>
> Of course, one should try to avoid sending auto-replies to list emails
> at all, but chances are you'll never be able to detect with 100%
> accuracy all list emails, so should count on it happening sometime.
Perhaps; but if so, having the auto-responder *NOT* respond to the
list address is still a win!
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
