Re: New qmail version request

[Peter van Dijk]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 02:39:28PM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From:  Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date:  Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:25:21 -0600
> >
> > Much of the common patches that are around fail in one of the tests above,
> > at least when using the author's stringent tests.  There's nothing wrong
> > with this; he keeps qmail secure, reliable, efficient, and "correct",
> > and anyone who wants to applies patches as they see fit.
> 
> I, for one, am hoping that 2.0 will have LDAP support which meets his standards.  
> Of course, from what I've seen this means he'll have to write his own LDAP 
> library and probably his own server as well.  Not that that would be a bad 
> thing, but securing everything that an MTA needs does seem to distract him 
> into rather extensive tangents.

LDAP is not part of an MTA. It's an extension.

Greetz, Peter.