Russell Nelson wrote:
>
>
> The problem, simply enough, is that you should try very, very hard not
> to have a separate copy of the email on the disk. If you're running
> qmail-inject on each message, then yes, three machines aren't going to
> be enough. On the other hand, three machines of the type you describe
> below will be sufficient to deliver one million emails in about eight
> hours, IF you're doing the mail merge function at delivery time.
>
> You can do that using the qmail-verh patch, you could call
> qmail-remote directly (in theory; I don't know that anyone is doing
> that), or you could purchase my qmail-merge system. It lets you
> substitute multiple fields into each message. So you could substitute
> in a first name, a last name, a database ID number, or whatever else
> you want. Handles bounces, and runs everything through the database.
> Details upon request.
>
Russ,
I emailed you off list a few days ago about your qmail-merge system, but
as yet have had no reply did you get it ? Can please contact me off
list.
<appologis to rest of list for a gratuitous waste of bandwidth>
Thanks
Greg
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
> Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | #exclude <windows.h>
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX |
