On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:28:07AM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010725 10:22]:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 10:19:59AM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > Thanks for the pointers... I have a slight memory that rfc-ignorant also
> > > planned to do ip blacklists att the outset, but whatever...
> > It will, probably, for any type of rfc-violation that makes IP
> > blacklisting a valid method. For the violations they list now, listing
> > IPs makes no sense.
>
> Wouldn't it? If I recieve spam from 192.168.100.1, I would like to be able
> to complain to postmaster at that host (or some host that whois discovers
> for that IP) about this...
AFAIK listing IPs that don't accept postmaster is a plan.
If whois discovers an address, and postmaster at that domain doesn't
work, it can be listed right now.
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
