Hi Guys,
I mentioned this to my boss yesterday highlighting that it is potentially better than SA and after reading the FAQ it certainly seems that way. They are fairly reluctant to change anything at this point, but I'm all for it. If I can help I will, it might be a good idea to collate all information that we can find in relation to dspam and qmail and simscan. There are already a few links on the list. Our SA currently is very effective, but I belief in improving where possible. Craig -----Original Message----- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 October 2006 21:49 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster Thanks Marco. We're (obviously) a long way from testing, but I'll let you know when we need you. Marco Cordeiro wrote: > I'm a volunteer to test dspam on one of my servers running centos4.4 and > send feedback to the list. > I fact this server act only as mx secundary to some clients but, > I can use as primary MX to a specific domain and test on it. > > Eric, fell free to contact me. > > []'s > Marco Cordeiro > > > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
