I've never used this port and when I set outlook to it, it just fails. Do I have to set the server up with a SSL certificate or something?
-----Original Message----- From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:32 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch Correct. On 1/23/07, Dan Herbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So just to clarify, if I set my roaming users laptops to send through port > 587 it will bypass the blacklists but will require authentication? I've been > having lots of trouble with the new zen.spamhaus.org blacklist since the > upgrade. Seems the PBL advisory list has every IP block of roadrunner on the > list which is now causing all my roaming users to have their emails kicked > back even though they authenticate. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:02 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch > > As time has gone by, a lot of isp's have been blocking outgoing port > 25 for all but their static users. I always recommend my users set > port 587 in case they use someone elses Wireless they can still use my > Toaster for outgoing without issue. There are advantages for using the > standard. > > Erik > > On 1/23/07, Sergey Menshikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Eric "Shubes" wrote: > > Sergey Menshikov wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I have to accept e-mail from users in blacklisted IPs, so attached are > > the simple patches for qmail-smtpd and rblsmptd to delay RBL rejection > > until smtp DATA command is issued. > > > > * rblsmtpd with option -e, if IP is blacklisted, sets environment > > variable BLACKLISTMSG to rejection code and message and, in all > > cases, starts qmail-smtpd. > > * qmail-smptpd checks for BLACKLISTMSG at DATA command stage, and, > > if set, and not authenticated, outputs the message, aborting DATA > > command. > > > > Fairly trivial but I believe useful patch, I wonder if it could be > > included into distribution. > > > > I tested it on and still use it on my site, using rpmbuild against > > > > * ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2.src.rpm > > * qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7.src.rpm > > > > Thank you! > > > > Best regards, > > Sergey Menshikov > > > > > > Sergey, > > > > The latest toaster now uses the standard smtp submission port (587), which > > does not check blacklists and requires authentication. I'm not certain > which > > version first contained this change, but it was after 1.3.7. > > > > > > Thanks, Eric, I did not know this :) > > > > Though asking all my friends and family to find their SMTP port setting > and > > change it to 587 is harder for me than patch qmail ;) > > > > Best regards > > Sergey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
