EE, The firewall.sh script needs to be modified on the main site to allow port 587 for submission. Just a reminder. ;)
Dan Herbon wrote: > No I cannot telnet to port 587. ill look around. Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:47 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch > > No, it can be used with or without SSL. Is a firewall blocking the port > (standard toaster firewall does not), or port not being forwarded? (depends > on your configuration) > > Can you telnet into 587? > > Dan Herbon wrote: >> I've never used this port and when I set outlook to it, it just fails. Do > I >> have to set the server up with a SSL certificate or something? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:32 PM >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch >> >> Correct. >> >> On 1/23/07, Dan Herbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> So just to clarify, if I set my roaming users laptops to send through > port >>> 587 it will bypass the blacklists but will require authentication? I've >> been >>> having lots of trouble with the new zen.spamhaus.org blacklist since the >>> upgrade. Seems the PBL advisory list has every IP block of roadrunner on >> the >>> list which is now causing all my roaming users to have their emails > kicked >>> back even though they authenticate. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:02 PM >>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com >>> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Auth before RBL patch >>> >>> As time has gone by, a lot of isp's have been blocking outgoing port >>> 25 for all but their static users. I always recommend my users set >>> port 587 in case they use someone elses Wireless they can still use my >>> Toaster for outgoing without issue. There are advantages for using the >>> standard. >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> On 1/23/07, Sergey Menshikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Eric "Shubes" wrote: >>>> Sergey Menshikov wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I have to accept e-mail from users in blacklisted IPs, so attached are >>>> the simple patches for qmail-smtpd and rblsmptd to delay RBL rejection >>>> until smtp DATA command is issued. >>>> >>>> * rblsmtpd with option -e, if IP is blacklisted, sets environment >>>> variable BLACKLISTMSG to rejection code and message and, in all >>>> cases, starts qmail-smtpd. >>>> * qmail-smptpd checks for BLACKLISTMSG at DATA command stage, and, >>>> if set, and not authenticated, outputs the message, aborting DATA >>>> command. >>>> >>>> Fairly trivial but I believe useful patch, I wonder if it could be >>>> included into distribution. >>>> >>>> I tested it on and still use it on my site, using rpmbuild against >>>> >>>> * ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.2.src.rpm >>>> * qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.7.src.rpm >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Sergey Menshikov >>>> >>>> >>>> Sergey, >>>> >>>> The latest toaster now uses the standard smtp submission port (587), >> which >>>> does not check blacklists and requires authentication. I'm not certain >>> which >>>> version first contained this change, but it was after 1.3.7. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, Eric, I did not know this :) >>>> >>>> Though asking all my friends and family to find their SMTP port setting >>> and >>>> change it to 587 is harder for me than patch qmail ;) >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Sergey >>>> > > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
