Greetings, Erik. 31 ?????? 2007 ?., 6:02:20 you have wrote: >> Separate tcprules file for submission port seems to me as a better >> approach. It keeps administration of QT flexible and unified, and also >> it is more cross-platforming way, as tcpserver works on any platform >> qmail can run on, while iptables is available only on linux systems >> based on kernels 2.4.x and later.
> Who cares? We don't even support Debian. . . :) Me, for example ;-D. A friend of mine, also a system engineer, administer small FreeBSD based cluster, and he uses QT in his setup. Accordingly to his words, it wasn't too hard to build and install RPM system on his BSD boxes, and then to correct specs so basic QT parts builds up and install successfully. Well, in any case we can always create tcp.submission ourselves, just like I do it for tcp.pop3 ;-D. But the laziness of sysadmin is the thing that makes me want tcp.submission to be included in stock toaster. -- Best Regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Development Department, Lavtech Corp http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
