the issue i am having is that the communication between simscan and
clamd is not immediate. i have to wait at least two minutes for mail
to start coming in.
connect(): No such file or directory
by the way, spamassassin 3.2.1 and 3.1.9 are out. when can we see them
for the current toaster?
On 6/18/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the
clamav problems stated on this list.
Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the
clamav group.
Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest
clamav (some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse
activiity.
In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I
did have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to
get everything working properly though.
Erik
On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely. I had to stop it to et the
machine back.
>
> After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about.
I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about
5 minutes then calms down.
>
> My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along
with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target.
Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server.
Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into full
production.
>
> I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's job.
>
> Phil
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to
> > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this:
> >
> > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while
> > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this???
> >
> > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides
> > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging
> > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating
> > deferals
> > for smtp.
> >
> > At this point I did som test in other servers and I realized that
> > 90.3takes a lot
> > more time to read the signatures than previous versions.
> >
> > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues
> > with
> > 0.90.3.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
