Have you rebuilt simscan since the upgrade? Occasionally simscan needs to be rebuilt against the latest libs.
Erik On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The SUSE you are running, is it 64bit? Erik, If you want to start a profile, here's mine; Fedora 6 x86_64 The machine was built specifically for QMT with nothing on it but what the QMT installer put there and I also installed webmin. -----Original message----- From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:47:18 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info > Hi Phil, > > this a virtualization server... 2xXEON 3,2GHz(now 2,6GHz), 16GB ram (now > 12), 4 dedicated RAID 1 Volumes running SUSE 10.2 with XEN > > > checking back 0.90.2 didn't have this issue. didn't try out 0.90.1... > > 2007/6/18, Phil Leinhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely. I had to stop it to et the > > machine back. > > > > After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking > > about. I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at > > 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down. > > > > My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along > > with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI > > target. Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this > > server. Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once > > I go into full production. > > > > I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's > > job. > > > > Phil > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > From: "A M" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400 > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz > > to > > > a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this: > > > > > > when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while > > > doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this??? > > > > > > the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services > > besides > > > QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes > > hoging > > > the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating > > > deferals > > > for smtp. > > > > > > At this point I did som test in other servers and I realized that > > > 90.3takes a lot > > > more time to read the signatures than previous versions. > > > > > > Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some > > issues > > > with > > > 0.90.3. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- > > > AM > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > AM > agmsoft(at)gmail.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]