Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Phil Leinhauser wrote:
>> I was wondering why mtime only returned one page... I missed the
>> --more--. mtime does seem to work correctly to find the messages.
>>
>> Why is there a preference to ctime over mtime? I just did a bit of
>> reading and it seems mtime only changes when the file changes but ctime
>> might change with ACL changes or even flag changes? I'm thinking to
>> myself... Hmmm Archive bit... I'm using backup exec to backup this
>> server. Changing the archive bit or grab it for backup might change the
>> ctime???
>
> I would think so. Perhaps mtime would be more appropriate. Would this
> apply to the qtp-clean-spam script as well?
Since I'm backing up the entire vpopmail folder to backup exec, I would
think everything is going to get the archive bit reset. So to answer
your question, yes, I would think it applies to qtp-clean-spam.
-P
(sorry for the blank reply)
I suppose you might check the ctime value with the ls command to verify
this theory? I'm not sure about the archive bit, but I presume it
resides with the inode data, so ctime would change when the archive bit
is set.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
