Hi Hasan,
Any update on working on this patch. I tried but didn’t succeed. With Regards, Amit Dalia From: Hasan Akgöz [mailto:hasanak...@mail.ru] Sent: 02 August 2014 17:10 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Prevent sender from spoofing email address Hi Guys; I've been misunderstood. Eric says "I'm curious to know if there's a way to do this with postfix" . I have to think about what you want to learn how to write. If there is not anything to compare with postix. In the meantime, my car is damaged lights, car lights change to change is not it make more sense :) . I read the source code a bit. I'm working on a patch.I will be sharing the results. good works. 2014-07-28 17:39 GMT+03:00 Eric Shubert <e...@shubes.net <mailto:e...@shubes.net> >: I already have the domain emailtoaster.com <http://emailtoaster.com> . :) -- -Eric 'shubes' On 07/28/2014 07:34 AM, Sebastian Grewe wrote: He does have a point there :D or just mail-toaster! On 28.07.2014, at 16:31, Dan McAllister <q...@it4soho.com <mailto:q...@it4soho.com> > wrote: On 7/27/2014 1:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 07/26/2014 09:03 PM, Hasan Akgöz wrote: I have both postfix and qmail mail servers. smtpd_sender_login_maps ( for postfix) The controlled_envelope_senders table specifies the binding between a sender envelope address and the SASL login names that own that address. You can use regex ( pcre ) or mysql tables etc.. for it. in the meantime Why not suitable for QMT.? I believe that this is what I described as being practical (without knowing of this capability in postfix). It's not suitable for QMT largely because it would involve a fairly major change to vpopmail and qmail, which is something we simply don't have resources to do. Perhaps "suitable" wasn't the best term to use. That being said, I think we should add this to the reasons for switching to postfix at some point in the future for use as a submission server, if not all roles which use smtp (also mx and sending, which use smtp). Another reason for using postfix is that it can be configured to throttle outbound messages. This is something that could be patched into qmail-remote (as we've discussed and I've even written a spec for), but at this point I feel that whatever time is spent doing this might be better spent converting to postfix. Anyone care to share their thoughts about this? Thanks. If we switch everything over to postfix, shouldn't we rename the project "postfix-toaster"? <grin> Dan -- IT4SOHO, LLC 33 - 4th Street N, Suite 211 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-3806 CALL TOLL FREE: 877-IT4SOHO 877-484-7646 Phone 727-647-7646 Local 727-490-4394 Fax We have support plans for QMail! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com> --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
