❯ dnf downgrade qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm Last metadata expiration check: 1:23:13 ago on Mon 18 Jul 2022 11:55:10 AM MDT. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libmysqlclient.so.18()(64bit) needed by qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64 - nothing provides libmysqlclient.so.18(libmysqlclient_18)(64bit) needed by qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
> On Jul 18, 2022, at 11:41 AM, Remo Mattei <r...@mattei.org> wrote: > > Ok I will try that. > >> Il giorno 18 lug 2022, alle ore 11:36, Eric Broch <ebr...@whitehorsetc.com> >> ha scritto: >> >> >> I think it has something to do with the new interface. >> >> Downgrade >> >> http://repo.whitehorsetc.com/7/spl/sqlmd/current/x86_64/old/qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm >> >> <http://repo.whitehorsetc.com/7/spl/sqlmd/current/x86_64/old/qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm> >> and it should work. >> >> I'll let you know when I have the new interface fixed. >> >> Eric >> >> On 7/18/2022 8:09 AM, AAL wrote: >>> Hello list >>> >>> We've two QMT running on CentOS7, just one with md install >>> >>> qmailadmin (with 'md') doesn't provide all the ezmlm's features to manage >>> lists >>> >>> To be brief, graphically: >>> >>> qmailadmin-1.2.16-3.2.qt.el7.x86_64 provides full ezmlm's features included >>> in webGUI >>> >>> <0iKOGVcSlptmQ6T0.png> >>> >>> >>> >>> On the opposite, qmailadmin-1.2.16-3.2.qt.md.el7.x86_64, has a very >>> limited set: >>> >>> <IM29GaaVy4niwhdj.png> >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there something inherent to many domains setup causing this? >>> >>> Can I recover full ezmlm's features in qmailadmin in some safe way? Both >>> are productive servers and I would avoid disrupt some services by doing >>> testing on it. >>> >>> Many thanks in advance >>> >>> >>> >>> __Abel >>> >>> >>> >>> --
