Sorry that’s not the issue for my topic!! 

Ignore my message. 

Remo 

> On Jul 18, 2022, at 12:19 PM, Remo Mattei <r...@mattei.org> wrote:
> 
> ❯ dnf downgrade qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:23:13 ago on Mon 18 Jul 2022 11:55:10 AM 
> MDT.
> Error:
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides libmysqlclient.so.18()(64bit) needed by 
> qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libmysqlclient.so.18(libmysqlclient_18)(64bit) needed by 
> qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to 
> use not only best candidate packages)
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 18, 2022, at 11:41 AM, Remo Mattei <r...@mattei.org 
>> <mailto:r...@mattei.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Ok I will try that. 
>> 
>>> Il giorno 18 lug 2022, alle ore 11:36, Eric Broch <ebr...@whitehorsetc.com 
>>> <mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com>> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think it has something to do with the new interface.
>>> 
>>> Downgrade
>>> 
>>> http://repo.whitehorsetc.com/7/spl/sqlmd/current/x86_64/old/qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm
>>>  
>>> <http://repo.whitehorsetc.com/7/spl/sqlmd/current/x86_64/old/qmailadmin-1.2.16-2.qt.md.el7.x86_64.rpm>
>>> and it should work.
>>> 
>>> I'll let you know when I have the new interface fixed.
>>> 
>>> Eric
>>> 
>>> On 7/18/2022 8:09 AM, AAL wrote:
>>>> Hello list
>>>> 
>>>> We've two QMT running on CentOS7, just one with md install 
>>>> 
>>>> qmailadmin (with 'md')  doesn't provide all the ezmlm's features to manage 
>>>> lists
>>>> 
>>>> To be brief, graphically:
>>>> 
>>>> qmailadmin-1.2.16-3.2.qt.el7.x86_64 provides full ezmlm's features 
>>>> included in webGUI
>>>> 
>>>> <0iKOGVcSlptmQ6T0.png>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On the opposite, qmailadmin-1.2.16-3.2.qt.md.el7.x86_64,  has a very 
>>>> limited set:
>>>> 
>>>> <IM29GaaVy4niwhdj.png>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Is there something inherent to many domains setup causing this?
>>>> 
>>>> Can I recover full ezmlm's features in qmailadmin in some safe way? Both 
>>>> are productive servers and I would avoid disrupt some services by doing 
>>>> testing on it.
>>>> 
>>>> Many thanks in advance
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __Abel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
> 

Reply via email to