On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Hugh Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but that would still give the 'blank' table for a second problem
> > when refreshing the data; rather than just a smooth update. (ie. no
> > visual impact if none of the data has changed)
>
> Sounds like you might need the fixes in
> http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770 and
> http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775
> as well.
>
> Derrell: have you considered these for checkin at all?
>
Hi Hugh,
These are both indicative of the problem I stated elsewhere recently: that
the remote data model isn't asked to pre-fetch data until it's needed for
display. That's too late in many cases. The request should be issued as
soon as it becomes clear that data _will_ be needed.
Your patches appear to cover up the problem more than fix it, if my
contention that the request for the data should be made earlier is the
correct solution to the problem. Would you agree?
Clearly a bunch of work needs to be done with the remote table model to make
it work better. Maybe applying your patches is the right thing to do until
there's time to do that work...
Ping me next week and I'll try to look into this in more depth.
Cheers,
Derrell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
