On 10/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Arnoldus wrote: > > From my point of view interop is the highest priority - why would I > > choose AMQP if it's not AMQP? > > > > yes, that is the point. but AMQP is still under development so with each > release we should be able to get better interop as the specification > gets more complete. so 0-10 makes it possible to not have hacks for JMS > needed in earlier versions. 0-11 should fill in security etc. So we > should get basic interop, but there is not much point in trying to deal > with all the gray areas in a previous versions of the spec, but rather > go to the latest where the issues have been debated out and specified. > > thanks for the comments. > Carl.
As I see it 0-9 is a suitable starting point for interop. as it has all the features required to support JMS. As the JMS over AMQP guide hasn't been released there is still issues with JMS interop over AMQP but that is a different story. -- Martin Ritchie
