On Jan 10, 2008 6:45 PM, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Arnoldus wrote: > > > From my point of view interop is the highest priority - why would I > > > choose AMQP if it's not AMQP? > > > > > > > yes, that is the point. but AMQP is still under development so with each > > release we should be able to get better interop as the specification > > gets more complete. so 0-10 makes it possible to not have hacks for JMS > > needed in earlier versions. 0-11 should fill in security etc. So we > > should get basic interop, but there is not much point in trying to deal > > with all the gray areas in a previous versions of the spec, but rather > > go to the latest where the issues have been debated out and specified. > > > > thanks for the comments. > > Carl. > > As I see it 0-9 is a suitable starting point for interop. as it has > all the features required to support JMS.
Not really, selectors are still an issue and there are few other issues as well. > As the JMS over AMQP guide hasn't been released there is still issues with > JMS interop over AMQP > but that is a different story. This is scoped for 0-11. > > > -- > Martin Ritchie > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
