On 11/01/2008, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 10, 2008 6:45 PM, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/01/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Michael Arnoldus wrote: > > > > From my point of view interop is the highest priority - why would I > > > > choose AMQP if it's not AMQP? > > > > > > > > > > yes, that is the point. but AMQP is still under development so with each > > > release we should be able to get better interop as the specification > > > gets more complete. so 0-10 makes it possible to not have hacks for JMS > > > needed in earlier versions. 0-11 should fill in security etc. So we > > > should get basic interop, but there is not much point in trying to deal > > > with all the gray areas in a previous versions of the spec, but rather > > > go to the latest where the issues have been debated out and specified. > > > > > > thanks for the comments. > > > Carl. > > > > As I see it 0-9 is a suitable starting point for interop. as it has > > all the features required to support JMS. > > Not really, selectors are still an issue and there are few other issues as > well.
But this wouldn't break interop. The non Qpid-Java broker would most likely ignore the arguments but connection would still occur. The client would just get more messages that expected. Which I would say is way better than the current situation of not having any functionality at all. A few other issues? I remember taking the Java client to to 100% compliance and I don't remember any other framing changes. True the Qpid java client uses more extensions to the protocol but for many simple JMS use cases it can work with a spec compliant 0-9 broker. Perhaps it is too late for me to remember the other issues. > > As the JMS over AMQP guide hasn't been released there is still issues with > > JMS interop over AMQP > > but that is a different story. > > This is scoped for 0-11. And this will address the full selector & queue browsing situation. But for now having all the brokers and clients supporting 09 (non-wip) seems like a great way of pushing acceptance of AMQP. People need to start seeing the benefit of AMQP and if they can't swap brokers or inter mix clients from one project with another then they won't _get_ the benefit that AMQP has to offer. > > > > > > -- > > Martin Ritchie > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ > -- Martin Ritchie
