Hi Carl, Comments inline ....
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I looked at the last spin artifacts. I think we have some cleanup / > decision to make before the next spin > > 1. Ruby & Python README's need some, how to use comments (I have pinging > Rafi) > 2. .NET ( we have a 0-8 client that has no changed since M2 and the new 010 > client. However the 010 client > is in a subdir, 0-8 is not. Should we move the 0-8 client into a subdir or > just delete it, as it can be obtained from M3 > or M2? It is problematic that the RELEASE_NOTES talk about M2 at the top > level and confusing We need to retain the 0-8 version as it is in use and may be upgraded. There were several fixes and enhancements to the 0-8 version in M3. I think a separate discussion on the 0-10 .Net client would be useful as I know some concerns existed around the review. > > 3. The Java build needs something in the README about Java 1.5 /1.6 or we > need to fix it. It also needs to be updated > with the ant instructions. I also think we should kill maven so people > don't try and fail to build with Maven. (Hiram's > issues trying to build) > I think the issue with the 4? classes should be addressed - I think Martin is going to raise a JIRA. Maven can be useful for generating the IDEA/Eclipse project files so maybe we could just document the build instructions for trunk ? I'm happy to do that. > > I am still checking licensing, but that is the punch list I have found so > far on the last spin. > > Volunteers welcome to help clean up. > Carl. > > I also sent some feedback on the alpha & beta. Be good to get Rafi's view of what he thinks should be done and we can pitch in. Bye for now, Marnie > > Marnie McCormack wrote: > >> Hi Rafi & All, >> >> What are our current M4 timelines currently looking like now ? >> >> I need to plan some testing on it and it'd be good to know what the dates >> are looking like. >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Marnie >> >> >> > >
