Hi Carl, My pref is strongly for c) at this point. After all, the 0-10 client doesn't interop with the Java Broker - so it can't be the only option we point to.
Regards, Marnie On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I think it's too late to be moving around directories at this stage. IMHO >> we should focus on testing, getting the READMEs up to date, and getting JIRA >> cleaned up. It's always been the case that each sub-project in qpid has its >> own private way of doing things, and our releases are a bit inconsistent as >> a result. I don't think we're going to solve this issue for M4, but if we >> make it a focus for the next devel cycle, there's a lot we could do to >> improve things for M5. I think if we were to do this it would be reasonable >> to drop the Milestone moniker from the release at that point. >> >> > I did some README clean up, which brought the question up for me. > > My concern is that it is confusing. The issue is the RELEASE_NOTE.txt file > in the top level talks about M2. > > options: > > a.) I could create a subdir for 0-8 and have top level REAME point to > readme's in each subdir. But NOT move the > 0-8 client into the subdir till after the release. > > b.) we can move 0-8 into a sub dir > > c.) we can do a bit more of what I have started -- add comments into the > top level files to point to client010 files and > strip out the out of date info around M2. > > any preferences? > > it can't go out with files that read like it is a M2 release. > Carl. >
