On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Randall Gellens wrote: > You mean "server mode is only *prevented* if there's the possibility ...."
er, yes. > You make a good point that server mode is not contraindicated solely > because of shell access, but only shell access that mucks with the > spool. > >More appropriate locking would nail this reasonably well, the problem > >really is that it is difficult to lock down. > > More appropriate locking in what way? As with the dual popper session issue, refuse to start if there's a pine or imap style lock on the mailbox, etc. AB
