Hi, > For the legal aspect you should ask a lawyer.
I can't afford one, even have access to. However, I'd *really* like to have the opinion of Nokia's employees and QtCreator's developers about these items: 1. Is it - at all possible - to distribute this reduced form of Qt Creator? In this case, exclusively in an open source form. 2. If yes, do I have to rename it? Any suggestions are welcome :) I'd need to do so in order to insure a proper installation on the user's machine (so that files from different packages don't get overwritten). 3. Is it possible to get an official confirmation from a Nokia representative? Is there any procedure? Thanks! -Ilyes On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Andre Poenitz <andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I finally found some time and implemented that idea. Code lives on >> http://qt.gitorious.org/~ilyesgouta/qt-creator/qt-editor >> >> So far, the changes actually are disabling some portions in the build >> system (all the non needed plugins and supporting code) and modifying >> CppTools to not depend on ProjectExplorer and SearchSymbol, etc. >> >> To Qt Creator developers: is it OK to name this editor qt-editor? > > For the legal aspect you should ask a lawyer. > > Andre' > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > Qt-creator@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
