|
I really don't think Nader would let terrorist run the world Stuntman and no matter who's in office we will still be fighting terrorist we have no choice and I think we'll still have an army under Nader and I seriously doubt they'll be sitting on their hands doing nothing to protect us that's just crazy.
As far as Congress or the Senate supporting him, if the people speak up and vote him in they won't have a choice but to support him it would send a serious message that people are sick and tired of supporting big business and "their" jobs would be on the line if they didn't support him, and let's face it they'll protect their job at all cost.
But this may all be uneccessary because Nader didn't make the California ballot so he may take over as the Green Party Nominee after all.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Monday, August 09, 2004 18:15:02
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] For those paying attention
While I agree in principle, Nadar doesn't have a chance in hell of
winning. But let's say he did. W/o an entrenched 3rd party he'll be
unable to get congress or the Senate to support him. We need
Independents throughout the system before any change would happen.
The Terrorist threat won't wait, it has to be dealt with now (as it is
under Bush's leadership), kissing Frances rump after their betrayed us
like Kerry wants to do is not acceptable. He also wants to toe the UN
line, also unacceptable.
So I'm more concerned with keeping Kerry out, who is VERY RICH but
tries to act like a working class hero. If elected he will return to
his old self.
Actualy have you checked out Bush's small business incentives and tax
breaks?
Not aimed at tax breaks for big business, they don't qualify.
It was why I've been trying so hard to get one up and running. Getting
an extra 50% 1st year depreciation on new equipment and software.
(that works out to an 83 1/3% depreciation for software, which
depreciates over 3 years, computer equipment 5 or 70% first year)
20/20 disproved that the tax breaks only benifited the rich, the top 1%
of socitey still pays approx 50% of all taxes.
Stuntman
>
>
> You know Stunt the only thing that worries me about Nader is the
terrorist
> situation we have but I'm not going to let these terrorist dictate
who I
> personally think cares about all American citizens and not big
business.
>
> I'm not voting for Bush or Kerry because a vote for them is a wasted
vote in
> my eyes, a vote for Nader is a vote for the truth and a vote for every
> American that has no say anymore in how our government is up for sale
to the
> highest bidder.
>
> I'm not voting for a bunch of freaking lies anymore it's like voting
for
> David Blane, you know it's a trick but you're still impressed any
ways.
>
> Mark
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Stuntman
> Date: Monday, August 09, 2004 15:25:10
> To: Tony Starez; Keith Hogan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] For those paying attention
>
>
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >
> >
> >
> > ....actually, i think Jesus was an independent, but running as a
> Democrat with very liberal views!! He was definitely FOR social
> programs that helped the poor, even healing the disABLED...if only
> Kerry could do that!! I think under Jesus we would have health
> coverage. I don't think Jesus cared about getting a tax cut because i
> remember him asking someone 'who's face is on the coin?' , speaking
of
> the emperor, and then saying 'give it to him.' Besides, Jesus looked
> a LOT like dudes i've seen at Grateful Dead concert or a Phish
> show...how many Republicans do you find there???<<
>
> You'd be surprised. Bet I've been to more Greatful Dead concerts than
> you, but phish isn't my style ;^) While I enjoyed Garcia's Utopian
> Vision in much of his music, it was an escape of the spirit that many
> people enjoyed. But the next day reality sets in as one gets back
into
> the rat race.
> I'll be voting republican again, and I've got long hair and a beard.
> I'm an Independent but Nader doesn't interest me. While I trust his
> honesty, I can't see him protecting us from the Terrorist threat. He
is
> a reasonable man, but they are not.
>
>
> Christ wasn't a POLITICIAN.
> His interest is Souls not votes.
> I doubt if he'd be in favor of any abortion, let alone late term
> abortion, so I guess he couldn't be a modern Democrat.
> Pretty sure he'd have issues with the Republicans too...
> So probably an Indepedent
> As for the other Ideologies go, I won't cast the first stone.
>
> Kerry is in a state of constant flux, changeing his stance on things,
> flip flopping depending on his audience of the day. He wants to use
his
> military service as part of his campaign, but seems to think nobody
has
> a right to question just what really happened during it. Sorry, but
you
> can't have it both ways. He claimed he commited "all sorts of
> autrocities" during his short 4 month tour in Vietnam & had the
> audacity to compare it to the abusive behavior at Abu Ghraib and
> suggesting the it was Bush's fault. So my personal opinion is that
the
> John Kerry running for President will do another flip flop if
elected,
> and the American public will never see his promises fulfilled.
>
> Although I don't believe in all of Bush's policies, he has done what
he
> said he would. He faced a downsliding economy when entering office,
and
> 9/11 had been in the planning for years by Al Queda. The UN had done
> nothing to force Sadamned into compliance with the 1991 treaty,
lining
> their pockets with oil for food money. 9/11 changed things. We
couldn't
> afford to take any chances that the Enemy of my enemy might
> become "their" friend. The UN was united when it passed article 1441,
> it wasn't based upon just the US's intel that Iraq still possessed
> WMD's. If Sadamned had dispossed of them in view of a UN inspection
> team as set down in the 1991 treaty, he could have ended the
sanctions
> a long time ago. He was given a LAST chance. He flubbed it, although
> when it came time to enforce the consequences for non-compliance,
> France stabbed us in the back. (Of course none of those post
> sanctions "Made in France" munitions and weapons had anything to do
> with their skulldugery right?)
>
> So while we have many problems and issues, unless we defeat terrorism
> none of them will matter for very long.
> Stuntman
>
--
It's not the fall that hurts.
. |
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
