It seems like every other session at IETF these days is about YANG...it certainly has some momentum.
Daniel On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Lou Berger wrote: > > Have you looked at or considered YANG? It is certainly the hammer of the >> day in this space... >> > > I've had a brief look at YANG. The needs of which should be considered. > E.g. try not deviate from its schemas unnecessarily and such. There's a > number of external protocols I think people would like to access Quagga via > and data-stores to sync Quagga's state to, I suspect. We should consider > all their needs, and try meet as many of those as possible, right? E.g., > HPE Networking is very interested in having Quagga state stored in OVSDB > (see OpenSwitch.net). > > So the things we need to consider: > > - Existing CLI > - SNMP > - YANG > - OVSDB > - <please reply with the protocol/schema/whatever you're interested in!> > > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > Bowie's Theorem: > If an experiment works, you must be using the wrong equipment. > > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
