On 4/20/2016 8:36 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> So are you arguing this point theoretically, or do you believe there's a >> > real issue with *this* change. Said another way, do you really think >> > there are operators using an max link cost in normal/stable day to day >> > operations (and not just as a maintenance tool)? > I don't recall what this change is, so no idea. I am just saying in > general changing defaults in a program that doesn't keep default values > in the config file is hazardous.
I don't think this is a case of changing defaults. In this *specific* case, it's a question of interoperable vs non-interoperable implementation. I think it's fine for quagga to do something non-standard, but it should default to standard/interoperable modes of operation. Lou _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
