On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
So even in a set of 4 patches, I would test patch 1, patch 1+2, patch
1+2+3 and finally patch 1+2+3+4 ?
Or test each on it’s own?
The former would be enough I think. The latter would discourage breaking
up patches into easier to review 'stories'.
If you want me to try this, then suggest something (i.e. name of
accumulating branch?) and I can give it a try.
'proposed'?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma | p...@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
It's amazing how much better you feel once you've given up hope.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
