On 6/8/2016 9:13 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Martin Winter wrote:
So even in a set of 4 patches, I would test patch 1, patch 1+2, patch
1+2+3 and finally patch 1+2+3+4 ?
Or test each on it’s own?
The former would be enough I think. The latter would discourage
breaking up patches into easier to review 'stories'.
I agree. In most cases there will be dependency between a series of
patches where each one may depend on previous patches in the series.
This would leave the developer no choice but to lump the whole thing
together as Paul pointed out.
--Jafar
If you want me to try this, then suggest something (i.e. name of
accumulating branch?) and I can give it a try.
'proposed'?
regards,
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
