On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
Get the obvious ones quickly then and leave the non obvious for the "slow"
process/review.
Right.
The essence of my comment is that there isn't a good way to fast-track a
small set of 'obvious' fixes ahead of everything else. Instead, it is
the "non-obvious" that will make themselves apparent in various ways; CI
systems will find issues, people will object to things they see and find
objectionable.
I.e., it's not easy to prioritise the "easy" stuff (particularly not in
an /objective/ way - and non-objective integration causes issues) and
fast-track it. It is however easy to identify the 'hard' stuff, that's
objectively the stuff that generates emails on the list. :) So we can
objectively sort that lower.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma | p...@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
To know Edina is to reject it.
-- Dudley Riggs, "The Year the Grinch Stole the Election"
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
