On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 08:04:39 UTC+10, Connor Page wrote: > I've managed to install pfSense as a HVM. not sure if it makes sense to run > it as a trusted firewall but that is possible. I created 2 netvms called LAN > and DMZ and created bridges in those. i made a copy of pfSense HVM config and > changed interface type to bridge, added a second virtual interface and linked > them to bridges in LAN and DMZ backends. a pci network interface was also > delegated to that domain (thought it would become the WAN) but pfSense didn't > recognize it. > I created an alternative config for a Manjaro HVM to connect to the bridge in > LAN and after manually setting addresses on all network interfaces and > bridges and a bit of tinkering with iptables I could login to pfSense admin > portal from Manjaro > I think putting it together with standard appvms and proxyvms in one network > topology is possible but I haven't tried yet. > > for reference re multiple network interfaces connecting to bridges > http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSVirtual
Whenever I perform an install, I always get "No-link-up conencted" when it tries to find the current WAN device and I've got it connected to the firewall instead of a physical device. I attach a physical device... "bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting" "bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x58000000" "bge0: firmware handshake timed out, found 0x58000000" Then a few minutes later it does it again. How did you get around this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/d1e2a954-445c-4bbc-a01e-680dddb764e9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
