On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 18:46:52 UTC, thorsten...@gmail.com  wrote:
> > Can you also try doing this against the template you're using for your 
> > sys-firewall?
> > 
> > qvm-features fedora-26-minimal qubes-firewall 1 
> 
> I did this and restarted everything, no difference.
> 
> 
> > Yes probably. For reference, to check (or enable):
> > - go to start menu/System Tools/Qube Manager
> > - right click sys-net/Qube Settings/Services tab
> > - clocksync should be in the list and ticked if not type clocksync and 
> > click on +
> > - I think a full reboot is required. There are probably ways to avoid it... 
> 
> clocksync is checked.
> 
> 
> > I am confused, did you do this in sys-net or sys-firewall. Because sys-net 
> > would have a default route and a route for your Lan. You may have tripped 
> > the info which is fine.
> 
> In fact I left the default routes away and just focused on the missing one.
> When I start sys-firewall a new network interface is added (vifx.0) where x 
> is a number.
> "ifconfig -a" displays:
> 
> vif3.0: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
> (and also 2 default interfaces: enp0s0 and lo, which are both UP and RUNNING)
> 
> 
> I noticed here that "UP" / "RUNNING" is missing for the vif, therefore I have 
> to "up" it myself.
> This might be part of the problem, since it has to be running in order to add 
> a new route (which should be done automatically).
> So "route" in sys-net displays only the default routes:
> 
> Destination     Gateway     Genmask     Flags     Metric     Ref     Use     
> Iface
> default     gateway     0.0.0.0     UG     100     0     0     enp0s0
> 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0     255.255.255.0     U     100     0     0    enp0s0
> 
> So if I add the route myself it additionally displays:
> 
> 10.137.0.6     0.0.0.0     255.255.255.255     U     100     0     0    vif3.0
> 
> So far so good, the values in sys-net are looking "ok" to me now. Or am I 
> missing something?

Yes looks good.

> 
> 
> > on sys-firewall, you are probably going to need to ifconfig eth0 up and you 
> > should have something like this:
> > -bash-4.4# netstat -nr
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt 
> > Iface
> > 0.0.0.0         10.137.0.14      0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0 
> > eth0
> > 10.137.0.14      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH        0 0          0 
> > eth0 
> 
> On sys-firewall eth0 and lo are UP and RUNNING, but "route" takes around 20 
> seconds to finish and displays:
> 
> Destination     Gateway     Genmask     Flags     Metric     Ref     Use     
> Iface
> default     gateway     0.0.0.0     UG     0     0     0     eth0
> gateway     0.0.0.0     255.255.255.255     UH     0     0     0    eth0
> 
> The long waiting time before "route" finishes makes me wonder...

This is probably just because it tries to resolve the IPs and DNS times out. if 
you use netstat -nr, it should be fast.

> 
> I deleted the default routes and recreated them. I also restarted the eth0 
> interface.
> 
> When I try to ping 8.8.8.8 from sys-firewall I get:
> 
> From 10.137.0.6 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 10.137.0.6 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
> ...
> 
> 
> I also switched the templates of sys-net and sys-firewall to debian-9, but 
> the result is the same (vif down in sys-net, no route for vif).
> 
> The more I try to fix this, I get a feeling that the root of the problem lies 
> inside sys-net.

Or the "physical" link between sys-net and sys-firewall. I believe there is a 
doc page (or maybe a thread here) on how to reconnect after a disconnection.

could you please do the arp -an after the ping 8.8.8.8
If you have a MAC address for sys-net, then you have "wire" connectivity, 
otherwise, it is where the pb is.

> It seems like the vif in sys-net does not get "up", which breaks the 
> setup/initialization script (or maybe it breaks earlier, I don't know).
> 
> If I knew, which steps have to be done to set up network between a VM, 
> sys-firewall and sys-net correctly, I could try to pinpoint the problem 
> better.
> What happens exactly behind the scenes when sys-firewall starts and uses 
> sys-net as netVM?
> Also I was thinking if iptables might be involved here?!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/23340a00-ae9a-4886-84e3-8906be13e949%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to