On 2019-12-02 05:47, Claudia wrote: > Frédéric Pierret: >> >> On 2019-12-02 01:01, Andrew David Wong wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> On 2019-11-28 1:16 AM, Claudia wrote: >>>> Andrew David Wong: >>>>> Please note that no user action is required regarding the OS >>>>> version in dom0. For details, please see our Note on dom0 and >>>>> EOL. [6] [6] >>>>> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/supported-versions/#note-on-dom0-and-eol >>>> Is it *possible* to upgrade dom0 to, say, F30, if we wanted to? I >>>> seem to remember reading somewhere it's pretty much impossible, but >>>> I haven't been able to find that article. >>>> >>> Not as far as I know, but Marek and Frédéric (CCed) would know more >>> about this. >> >> Even if in theory, this is possible but that would mean to patch R4.0 >> with a lot of adjustments in upstream R4.1. I would discourage such >> attempt because there is major differences between fc25 and fc30. That >> would also mean doing the work we have done for going to dom0 fc29. >> >> We are going to use dom0 fc31 instead of fc29 for next release 4.1 and >> there is also other troubles like python3 migration as python2 is >> assumed deprecated in Fedora 31. >> >>>> I have a newer machine, and I've found several hardware features >>>> that work under F30 but not F25 and not under Qubes even with the >>>> same kernel version as tested in F30 (suggesting the Fedora >>>> userland plays a role too). >>>> >>>> It seems like the 5+ version lag could be holding back a lot of >>>> potential Qubes users. Especially considering Qubes/Xen is quite >>>> hardware-sensitive to begin with. >>>> >>> It sounds like your best bet might be to try R4.1, which will run >>> Fedora 29: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4225 > > Thanks for the responses. That's pretty much what I was expecting to > hear. I did install 4.1 on this machine at one point, but after > installation it would hang at the boot splash, so I couldn't test if > the hardware worked. Incidentally, I ran into that same issue when I > install 4.0.2 and was able to fix it, so I may be able to get 4.1 > running this time around. (In case you're interested: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qubes-users@googlegroups.com/msg31199.html) > > Is there an ETA on the F31-based 4.1 build, or is it still going to be > a while? Is there a specific build or milestone or something should I > be watching for? (I plan on getting the iso from openqa)
Before end of the month we hope to have a testing ISO for dev purpose. Currently we are on upgrading Fedora installer which have drastically changed the way of creating ISO. > ------------------------------------------------- > This free account was provided by VFEmail.net - report spam to > ab...@vfemail.net > > ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out > of the NSA's hands! > $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No > bandwidth quotas! > Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/ba8dbe64-88bd-dbdf-4389-d53a56016ba8%40orange.fr.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
