"Richard B. gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
> Maybe there should be a specification, perhaps in the new RFC, that
> says what to do if a refclock failure is detected.
>
> Marking the refclock "insane" comes to mind as a reasonable response.

Congratulations, Richard. I think that's a first. Not a single
exclamation point anywhere!

Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink


_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to