Personally, I think it is Wrong for a refclock to call abort(), but I reserve the right to change my mind if I get my way and implement "design by contract" throughout the codebase.
The problem is that there is no maintainer for that refclock and I do not want to make things worse (and I do not want to increase my workload). H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
