Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think ntpdate 4.2.0 just uses the first returned address, and now > that Marcos has said he's running Solaris I've remembered that > ntpdate 4.2.0 on Solaris doesn't work with IPv6 anyway because > Solaris changes the IPv6 socket structure in a way which ntpdate > doesn't expect
> http://lists.ntp.isc.org/pipermail/questions/2005-March/004535.html I wonder if that is still the case in "5.10" Anyway, does ntpdate set the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag? If not, doing so should prevent it from getting IPv6 answers when there is no IPv6 address configured on the system running ntpdate. Whether ntpdate should be enhanced to walk the list I guess would be an open question. rick jones -- The glass is neither half-empty nor half-full. The glass has a leak. The real question is "Can it be patched?" these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
