> After instructing it to use a different baud rate, you have to
> reset the device for it to take effect, either by issuing a reset
> command, or by power cycling it.

OK, thanks.  I'll try that.  I gather that the Garmin GPS has some
flash RAM (or a builtin backup battery), so it retains its settings
even if power is removed?

> Also, once you have it talking at a rate other than 4800 bps,
> you'll need to inform ntpd to open the port at that rate by using
> an appropriate mode value on the server 127.127.20.1 line.

Right.  I saw that in the NTP documentation.  I tried it early on,
thinking that perhaps the driver would use the mode value to set the
GPS's baud rate -- but, of course, that didn't work.

Before I try resetting the baud rate, here's what the GPS currently
looks like on my test server (sixeyes.richw.org).  The jitter values
have gone way down, but the GPS offset is still high (even with the
mode set to look at only $GPRMC), and the PPS offset still differs by
several msec from Stanford's clock.

     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
xGPS_NMEA(0)     .GPS.            9 l    9   16  377    0.000  -629.69   4.781
xPPS(0)          .PPS.            8 l    6   16  377    0.000    3.811   0.055
+liberation.rich 10.0.229.53      5 u    3   16  377    2.196   -0.244   0.695
+whodunit.richw. 10.0.229.114     4 u   12   32  377    2.211   -0.264   0.423
*iknow.richw.org 171.64.7.55      3 u    9   32  377    9.242   -1.457   4.772

And on iknow.richw.org (the box my test server, sixeyes, is syncing to):

     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
 liberation.rich 10.0.229.53      5 u   10   32    0    7.388    0.785   0.000
 whodunit.richw. 10.0.229.114     4 u  208  256  376    7.126    0.948   2.469
 sixeyes.richw.o 127.0.0.1       13 u   16   32  376    9.375    1.419   1.033
+Avallone.Stanfo 171.64.7.87      2 u  241 1024  377    0.756   -0.648   0.192
*caribou.Stanfor 171.64.7.87      2 u  150 1024  377    0.796   -2.838   0.265
+dusk.Stanford.E 171.64.7.87      2 u  696 1024  377    0.774   -0.560   0.273

In case it matters here, iknow is on the campus network (in my office),
and it's linked via OpenVPN to my home LAN.  I'm using interleaved mode
to compensate for the fact that Internet service to my home goes through
a cable modem infrastructure.

And, finally, the view from grandfather.stanford.edu (the stratum-1 server
which Stanford's stratum-2 boxes are syncing to):

     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
*TRUETIME(1)     .GPS.            0 l    8   64  377    0.000   -0.741   1.203
+bigben.cac.wash .USNO.           1 u  678 1024  377   21.687    9.502   0.177
+clock.isc.org   .GPS.            1 u  688 1024  377    4.706    2.829   0.131

You might remember I brought up the issue, some time ago, of how the
University of Washington's server (bigben) appears to be way off.

-- 
Rich Wales  /  ri...@richw.org  /  ri...@stanford.edu
Wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richwales
Facebook:   http://www.facebook.com/richwales
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to