Michael Deutschmann wrote:
> someone wrote:
>> Both are aimed at stopping unintentional emissions.
>>
>> Sure a TEMPEST PC would far exceed CE EMC / FCC Part 15 B, ...
>
> Couldn't the goals of TEMPEST be achieved by a computer
>  that deliberately produces random noise, so as to drown
>  out the unintended signal?  The hams sure wouldn't like
>  that.

They have emission limits, just like the commercial / consumer
 rules, just much lower.

-- 
E-Mail Sent to this address <blackl...@anitech-systems.com>
  will be added to the BlackLists.

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to