On 7/14/2010 3:49 AM, Kostas Magkos wrote: > > Dave Hart wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:22 UTC, Kostas Magkos >> <k...@islab.demokritos.gr> wrote: >> >>> But what about symmetrical peering? I cannot verify this association. >>> For example, when I query the servers for their peers with ntpq (ntpq >>> -p) they give out a 'u' (in the 't' column) for each other. Shouldn't >>> there be a 's' code, as in symmetric peer? >>> >> >> Please see http://bugs.ntp.org/1338. As noted there, the type column >> in the peers billboard (ntpq -p) was pretty screwed up prior to >> 4.2.7p14. So, yes, if you use a recent 4.2.7 (ntp-dev) tarball, there >> should be a "s" code. Your OS is using ntpd 4.2.2 circa June 2006, so >> in about four years, you should see your type column improve. >> > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for the info. You've got me thinking, that maybe its time to give > up on the debian stock version... >
Steve has been regularly packaging up the Debian builds. I don't know any details but he should be able to comment more on this. Danny > What other options are there to monitor the state of symmetric peers? > How can I be sure the peering works? > > Thanks in advance, > Kostas _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
