David Woolley wrote: > BlackLists wrote: >> David Woolley wrote: >>> This is the first I've heard of it, so I assume that it has never >>> appeared on this newsgroup, and its authors are not active here. >> >> I recall it coming up before. >> <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=radclock&scoring=d> > > I think you meant > http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=radclock&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2012&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2012&as_ugroup=comp.protocols.time.ntp&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&safe=off > > I think there were more references to Windows malware than time > synchronisation without the comp.protocols.time.ntp constraint.
Yes, I mangled trimming the silly long link, thanks. <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=radclock+ntp&scoring=d> -- E-Mail Sent to this address <blackl...@anitech-systems.com> will be added to the BlackLists. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions