David Woolley wrote:
> BlackLists wrote:
>> David Woolley wrote:
>>> This is the first I've heard of it, so I assume that it has never
>>>  appeared on this newsgroup, and its authors are not active here.
>>
>> I recall it coming up before.
>> <http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=radclock&scoring=d>
>
> I think you meant
> http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=radclock&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2012&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2012&as_ugroup=comp.protocols.time.ntp&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&safe=off
>
> I think there were more references to Windows malware than time
> synchronisation without the comp.protocols.time.ntp constraint.

Yes, I mangled trimming the silly long link, thanks.
<http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=radclock+ntp&scoring=d>

-- 
E-Mail Sent to this address <blackl...@anitech-systems.com>
  will be added to the BlackLists.

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to