unruh wrote:
But then there is the comments about one way timing ( the server sends
out the signals, and then sometime  the computers send out two way
signals so as to estimate the trip time. What is the purpose of the one
way signals? You certainly have zero estimate of the delay on that that
particular signal.

This is obviously from their experimental support of the Ethernet hw time sync protocol, since that protocol is based on having _many_ time sync packets, usually 1 to 16 pr second.

These packets can then be broadcast on the local LAN, supporting lots of lab gear simultaneously, while each piece of client gear sends a two-way request every few seconds in order to determine the current propagation delay.

This protocol can also use single or dual-packet operation, where the dual-packet setup uses the second packet to transmit the actual sending time of the first packet in the pair.

Cell tower base stations use this protocol to achieve low ppb frequency offsets, in order to handle tower-to-tower handover at speed. (You need ~20 PPB frequency precision to perform a handover of a cell phone that's on a high-speed (250-300 km/h) train.)

Terje

--
- <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no>
"almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
  • Re: [ntp:quest... skillz...@gmail.com
  • Re: [ntp:quest... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
    • Re: [ntp:... David Woolley
      • Re: [... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... Julien Ridoux
          • ... unruh
            • ... Harlan Stenn
            • ... unruh
            • ... Rob
            • ... unruh
            • ... Terje Mathisen
            • ... Julien Ridoux
            • ... unruh
            • ... Julien Ridoux
            • ... unruh
            • ... Julien Ridoux
            • ... Uwe Klein
            • ... Brian Utterback
          • ... skillz...@gmail.com
            • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
            • ... Dave Hart

Reply via email to