Nick <m...@privacy.net> wrote: <snip>
> This performance is marginal for WSJTX. I need 10ms offset or less after > 15 minutes. What make you think that? I see a lot of WSJTX signals that are within +/- .5 seconds and occasionally some over a second off and they still decode. Most seem to be +/- .3 seconds. We are talking about this aren't we: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html Though I agree ntp should be doing a lot better than you are seeing. -- Jim Pennino _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
