On 2014-12-06, Paul <tik-...@bodosom.net> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:57 PM, William Unruh <un...@invalid.ca> wrote: > >> But then this thread was about Redhat, which is Linux. > > > > I understand that but it's not the point. This thread is about a distro > defaulting to Chrony -- and why that's a bad (or good) thing. I say it's an > inconvenience because I'm uninterested in Chrony on Linux (RedHat or > otherwise). While we have many Linux boxes many of our servers are not > Linux/BSD based. It's bad enough dealing with various versions of NTP > without having yet another critical part of the infrastructure be > different. Luckily we're busy moving away from RedHat.
AFAIK they will still ship ntpd as well. You can pretty easily uninstall chrony and install ntpd if that is what you desire. You have to set up lots of other stuff on your systems anyway. And this default is way way down on the list of problems in comparison to Redhat defaulting to systemd:-) _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
